I think the fact Avatar is such a visually rich film - and the 3D aspect really draws you into that world - it feels more real than it should as a predominantly digital film. It's certainly stayed with me (and I am keen to see it again on the big screen), but the viewing experience left me elated and remembering why I love fantasy so much ... not depressed or suicidal.
As you say, if that reaction is real, it's pretty tragic. But I'm glad to hear support groups have cropped up already!
In my opinion 3D should be a tool and not a purpose on it's own. Avatar sounds to me like they have forgotten about that and just made the movie for the 3D effects. The story sounds like it might just as well have been set in America in frontier times.
People are actually depressed because it isn't real? Ok, now I say instead of a life, they need to get a bit of imagination. It can be real in your head if you want it to be.
Charles-- I'm sure that a lack of imagination is only part of the problem. I'm no psychologist, but it sounds as if these people have a serious problem with perspective and separating fantasy with reality. I think the stalker mentality is one in which the person has an inability to separate their fantasy life with the real world and this seems similar to me. Only their obsession this time is a movie.
I suspect it's a collection of real phenomenon and media hype. The result of the latter is that the phenomenon gets bigger as attention-desperate yahoos search for new ways to feel accepted. Most of them probably aren't actually suicidal, but saying you are gets attention. (Some of them, though, likely are, just not the overwhelming majority of those claiming suicide as a result of seeing a movie).
It's sort of like people who latch on to fictional characters from Twilight. Some of it is real infatuation, and some of it is just a way of expressing previously held internal desires and the like.
I've been reading too much Freud and Lacan, though...
I went to see it reluctantly, and was very impressed with it despite my misgivings. (I did NOT see it 3D however. I hate 3D. gives me a headache.)
The thing uses all the standard tropes and is totally a feel good plot that's been done a thousand times...but it was done well, like Star Wars did it well in that first awesome movie. And that is what it is, not intellectual, not groundbreaking (except for the cgi stuff.) I think it'll stand the test of time.
I listened to all the "you HAVE to see this on the big screen" talk and decided to go see it with my wife on Thursday night. My feeling about the experience...Meh. While it cannot be argued convincingly that it was not visually stunning, I think I read too much hype because I guess I suspected something more than I got visually. Beautiful, yes. Wonderfully rendered, yes. Characters that were a step up in motion capture, yes. Some nice 3d effects, yes. But I still didn't find it such a massive leap forward that I would want to see it again.
The story is very cliched, which doesn't always bother me if I am entertained, but honestly there were a couple of times that I was just plain bored. The movie was way too long.
I think it is pretty sad to think people could have this strong of a reaction to a film, and at first I am tempted to make fun. But then I realize that some people have really rough lives and it probably isn't that much of a stretch to think that they could have that kind of experience with the film.
Should be "expected" something more, not "suspected". It is my intellect that is suspect! Ha! Typing while watching football playoffs is probably not a good combination.
@Sullivan McPig Sounds to me like you have not seen the movie. Cameron did a brilliant job blending 3d with great cinematography. After 10 minutes you forgot, that Avatar was 3d.
10 comments:
Great post.
I think the fact Avatar is such a visually rich film - and the 3D aspect really draws you into that world - it feels more real than it should as a predominantly digital film. It's certainly stayed with me (and I am keen to see it again on the big screen), but the viewing experience left me elated and remembering why I love fantasy so much ... not depressed or suicidal.
As you say, if that reaction is real, it's pretty tragic. But I'm glad to hear support groups have cropped up already!
In my opinion 3D should be a tool and not a purpose on it's own. Avatar sounds to me like they have forgotten about that and just made the movie for the 3D effects.
The story sounds like it might just as well have been set in America in frontier times.
People are actually depressed because it isn't real? Ok, now I say instead of a life, they need to get a bit of imagination. It can be real in your head if you want it to be.
Charles-- I'm sure that a lack of imagination is only part of the problem. I'm no psychologist, but it sounds as if these people have a serious problem with perspective and separating fantasy with reality. I think the stalker mentality is one in which the person has an inability to separate their fantasy life with the real world and this seems similar to me. Only their obsession this time is a movie.
I suspect it's a collection of real phenomenon and media hype. The result of the latter is that the phenomenon gets bigger as attention-desperate yahoos search for new ways to feel accepted. Most of them probably aren't actually suicidal, but saying you are gets attention. (Some of them, though, likely are, just not the overwhelming majority of those claiming suicide as a result of seeing a movie).
It's sort of like people who latch on to fictional characters from Twilight. Some of it is real infatuation, and some of it is just a way of expressing previously held internal desires and the like.
I've been reading too much Freud and Lacan, though...
I went to see it reluctantly, and was very impressed with it despite my misgivings. (I did NOT see it 3D however. I hate 3D. gives me a headache.)
The thing uses all the standard tropes and is totally a feel good plot that's been done a thousand times...but it was done well, like Star Wars did it well in that first awesome movie. And that is what it is, not intellectual, not groundbreaking (except for the cgi stuff.) I think it'll stand the test of time.
Writtenwyrd--thanks! That makes me feel a little better about the prospect of seeing it.
I listened to all the "you HAVE to see this on the big screen" talk and decided to go see it with my wife on Thursday night. My feeling about the experience...Meh. While it cannot be argued convincingly that it was not visually stunning, I think I read too much hype because I guess I suspected something more than I got visually. Beautiful, yes. Wonderfully rendered, yes. Characters that were a step up in motion capture, yes. Some nice 3d effects, yes. But I still didn't find it such a massive leap forward that I would want to see it again.
The story is very cliched, which doesn't always bother me if I am entertained, but honestly there were a couple of times that I was just plain bored. The movie was way too long.
I think it is pretty sad to think people could have this strong of a reaction to a film, and at first I am tempted to make fun. But then I realize that some people have really rough lives and it probably isn't that much of a stretch to think that they could have that kind of experience with the film.
Should be "expected" something more, not "suspected". It is my intellect that is suspect! Ha! Typing while watching football playoffs is probably not a good combination.
@Sullivan McPig
Sounds to me like you have not seen the movie.
Cameron did a brilliant job blending 3d with great cinematography.
After 10 minutes you forgot, that Avatar was 3d.
Post a Comment